• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 50 (2020)
Volume Volume 49 (2019)
Volume Volume 48 (2018)
Volume Volume 47 (2017)
Volume Volume 46 (2016)
Volume Volume 45 (2015)
Volume Volume 44 (2014)
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 43 (2013)
BASHIR, M., FARID, A., RABIA, I., MOSTAFA, B., EL AMIR, A. (2014). SEROLOGICAL VERSUS ANTIGEN DETECTION METHODS FOR GIARDIA DUODENALIS DIAGNOSIS. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, 44(3), 709-718. doi: 10.12816/jesp.2014.90161
M. BASHIR; A. FARID; I. RABIA; B. MOSTAFA; A. EL AMIR. "SEROLOGICAL VERSUS ANTIGEN DETECTION METHODS FOR GIARDIA DUODENALIS DIAGNOSIS". Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, 44, 3, 2014, 709-718. doi: 10.12816/jesp.2014.90161
BASHIR, M., FARID, A., RABIA, I., MOSTAFA, B., EL AMIR, A. (2014). 'SEROLOGICAL VERSUS ANTIGEN DETECTION METHODS FOR GIARDIA DUODENALIS DIAGNOSIS', Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, 44(3), pp. 709-718. doi: 10.12816/jesp.2014.90161
BASHIR, M., FARID, A., RABIA, I., MOSTAFA, B., EL AMIR, A. SEROLOGICAL VERSUS ANTIGEN DETECTION METHODS FOR GIARDIA DUODENALIS DIAGNOSIS. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, 2014; 44(3): 709-718. doi: 10.12816/jesp.2014.90161

SEROLOGICAL VERSUS ANTIGEN DETECTION METHODS FOR GIARDIA DUODENALIS DIAGNOSIS

Article 18, Volume 44, Issue 3, Autumn 2014, Page 709-718  XML PDF (283.17 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.12816/jesp.2014.90161
Authors
M. BASHIR1; A. FARID2; I. RABIA3; B. MOSTAFA1; A. EL AMIR2
1Departments of Environmental Research, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Giza, Egypt.
2Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Egypt.
3Departments of Environmental Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Giza, Egypt.
Abstract
Giardiasis constitutes an important public health problem in the world. Contamination of the water with fecal materials including viruses and pathogenic protozoa still represents an environmental health hazard, especially in rural areas. The survey study evaluated the relation between seropositivity and some risk factors. Moreover, the study compared between the serological IgG and IgM level and antigen detection methods for the diagnosis of giardiasis. The results indicate that sex distribution and age were the mean risk factors for seroprevelence. In this study, sera samples were employed
in sandwich ELISA assay, to detect circulating Giardia antigens. None of the negative control serum samples gave a positive reaction, but cross reaction was encountered with 3 case of Cryptosporidium. The specificity of the assay was 94.83%. On the other hand, the sensitivity of the Giardia patient’s sera was 94.12% which was higher than that of IgG (86.25%) and IgM (87.50%) secretion measurements. In conclusion, antigen detection methods give better and earlier diagnosis for giardiasis can be performed quickly and do not require an experienced and skilled morphologist.
Keywords
Egypt; patients; Giardia duodenalis; ELISA; IgG; IgM
Statistics
Article View: 9
PDF Download: 11
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.